Gtx 1660 Super Gaming Benchmarks and Review

In the nick of time for the Christmas shopping season, we have Gtx 1660 Super one but rather two new Super designs cards from Nvidia. For those of you not keeping tabs, we presently have the GTX 1660 for $220, the GTX 1660 Ti for $280, the RTX 2060 for $350 and the RTX 2060 Super for $400. In the value range somewhere in the range of $200 and $400 there were at that point 4 GeForce alternatives, however starting today we currently have 6. The GTX 1660 Super spaces in at $230 and there’s additionally the 1650 Super coming one month from now, no word on estimating yet.

Gtx 1660 Super Gaming Benchmarks and Review

So what’s going on the GTX 1660 Super? Not a great deal, to be straightforward however the first GTX 1660 Super was very acceptable as of now. We should survey it spec by spec: we get precisely the same GPU as the non-super, base model GTX 1660. It has similar 22 SM units/1408 CUDA centers which are timed at 1530 MHz with a similar GPU support clock of 1785 MHz, it conveys similar 88 surface units bringing about the equivalent texel fill rate.

All in all, it’s precisely the same 12nm 284mm2 bite the dust included 6.6 billion semiconductors. It additionally has a 6GB VRAM support, yet it’s here where the progressions have been made. Nvidia has overhauled the 8 Gb/s GDDR5 memory of the standard 1660 to 14 Gb/s GDDR6 memory and this sees a gigantic 75% increment in memory transmission capacity. Truth be told, this gives the 1660 Super much more memory data transmission than the Ti model.

Before we get into the benchmarks, here’s a fast recap of the $200 – $300 value portion this year. Path back in February we got the principal GTX 1660 arrangement GPU, the $280 Ti model. In our dispatch day audit we closed it was the primary GPU discharge in some opportunity that we’d leave away inclination totally satisfied. The 1660 Ti offered GTX 1070-like execution at a slight cost premium over the GTX 1060 6GB. With no contest from AMD it was a very decent outcome.

After a month we got the standard 1660 and we didn’t have anything terrible to say about it, not in any event, anything distantly negative. The 1660 was a decent worth contribution from Nvidia and it totally cleared out the GTX 1060 arrangement alongside the RX 580 and 590, however the 1660 Ti truly dealt with the 590.

That was until some other time in the year when the Radeon RX 590 dropped from around $300 to almost $200. Out of nowhere it was a competitor once more. By cutting costs AMD has figured out how to stay important in the financial plan and standard GPU market with their more seasoned RX 500 arrangement GPUs, and truth be told figured out how to turn into the go to choice underneath $200. Furthermore, that remaining parts the case today. The $200 RX 590 is almost certainly going to be thistle in the $230 GTX 1660 Super’s side. To coordinate with the worth of the RX 590, the new GTX 1660 Super may have to convey 1660 Ti-like execution.

Gtx 1660 Super Benchmarks

For testing we utilized our standard GPU test machine brandishing a Core i9-9900K timed at 5 GHz with 16GB of DDR4-3400 memory. Close by we have two GTX 1660 Super models, the MSI Gaming X and Gigabyte Gaming OC, and both convey precisely the same execution, commonly working at 1965 MHz. The MSI Gaming X crested at 63 C in our F1 2019 pressure test and with a fan speed of 1700 RPM it was exceptionally tranquil. The Gigabyte Gaming OC ran 1 degree cooler generally, however it crested at 65 C from time to time, the fans likewise turned 100 RPM quicker however the two cards were by and large calm when gaming. We’ve seen 17 games altogether, all tried at 1080p and 1440p.

Gtx 1660 Super Benchmarks

Table of Contents

First up we have Shadow of the Tomb Raider and here the new 1660 Super was 4% quicker than the base model. We suppose that is in accordance with the 4% value climb. Not by and large an energizing outcome but rather it was altogether quicker than the RX 590, so there’s that.

We see an emotional improvement when testing with Just Cause 4. This time the 1660 Super was 12% quicker than the base model, making it simply a solitary edge more slow than the 1660 Ti. Accordingly we’re taking a gander at GTX 1070-like execution in this title, and that is a GPU that used to cost $400 about 3.5 years prior. Not astonishing advancement, however welcome to 2019.

Resident Evil 2 shows basically no presentation elevate for the 1660 Super over the standard 1660, simply a ~2% increment for the normal casing rate. It likewise figured out how to coordinate with the RX 590.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *.

*
*
You may use these <abbr title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</abbr> tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>